Invisible Pipers: How “Kony 2012” is Enchanting the West and Recolonizing Africa

Mar 07, 2012 12 Comments by


In The Pied Piper of Hamelin, a small town suffering from a rat infestation is greeted by a strange visitor who promises to rid the village of the vermin by playing a magical pipe in exchange for a fee. The townspeople eagerly agree and as promised, the piper plays a song and the rats follow in tow as the piper marches out of town. When the piper returns to the village to collect payment, the people of the town refuse and in retribution, the pied piper sneaks back during the night and plays a song that causes the youth of the village to become so enchanted that they too begin to follow the piper. He lures them out of town just as he did the rats, never to be seen again.

Some historians have equated the Pied Piper of Hamelin with Nicholas of Cologne, who conscripted large numbers of youth from Germany to fight in the disastrous children’s crusade aimed at driving Muslims out of Jerusalem in 1212. While these events took place 800 years ago, liberal youth of today are still all too willing to be enchanted by charismatic leaders championing western ideologies in the defeat of racialized enemies.

The past several days has seen an explosion of attention centered around Joseph Kony, the leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and a man responsible for untold amounts of torment in the form of systematic murder, rape, torture, kidnapping, piracy, and the forced conscription of children into his army. A large segment of America knows of his crimes due to the operations of a project called “Invisible Children”.

Invisible Children (IC) started when a group of young American filmmakers traveled to Africa looking to document the events unfolding in the Darfur region of Sudan. What they came up with was no doubt a very important issue – one of Ugandan child soldiers and the violence committed at the hands of the LRA.

My criticism of the IC campaign generally, and the “Kony 2012” campaign more recently isn’t that it has malicious intention.  I have no doubt that the people supporting these projects mean well. However, the form which this message is delivered is one which is saturated with a deeply Eurocentric and patronizing attitude towards those who it affects. My intention is not to argue for inaction or apathy but rather to expose and challenge what I consider to be damaging representations and flawed strategies for addressing global violence.

Two Girls Having Fun Fighting Genocide and Sexual Slavery At An Invisible Children Rally

The Invisible Children franchise makes its finances public and despite it taking in almost 14 million in revenues last year, it spent only $2.8 million on direct services, i.e. services which directly aid those who you see in the videos they create. Despite this, they managed to spend over a million dollars just on travel expenses, which comes down to almost $3,000 per day, every day of the week, all year long.

If you donate to Invisible Children, there is a good chance your money is going to buying these people plane tickets or hotel rooms, not helping those who are being raped, kidnapped or tortured by Joseph Kony’s LRA.

Their official explanation for this is that they prefer to focus on strategies which “raise awareness” instead of direct aid. This of course raises the question- what is the point of raising awareness, if after people are made aware and choose to contribute, that money isn’t actually used to help people? Millions were made aware already. Millions of dollars were donated to their cause. They have chosen to spend a small fraction on directly aiding those they claim to represent and have instead chosen to jet-set around the world, rubbing elbows with politicians, appearing for interviews, amassing celebrity rosters, and generally living like superstars.

If your money isn’t bankrolling their lavish lifestyles, there is a good chance that your donations end up funding the very brutality you thought it was going to stop. Invisible Children, Inc. supports the Ugandan military, which, like the LRA, is known for its use of systematic sexual abuse. Human Rights Watch has noted that the Ugandan Government also engages in torture, extrajudicial killings and forced labor. Some might say this is a necessary evil, justified if it roots out Kony and the LRA. Such an argument however, doesn’t hold water. As we’ve mentioned before, and as multiple intelligence reports confirm, the LRA no longer has a presence in Uganda. Kony has been out of the country for years.

The Creators of Invisible Children Pose With The Ugandan Military

Turning our attention to their most recent publicity stunt, one which has untold numbers of kids on Facebook patting themselves on the back for posting a link in their status updates about it, the group at Invisible Children has released a video which attempts to raise awareness of Joseph Kony so that the world would take notice and presumably do something about it.

Ignoring for a moment that this film is about a decade late in its release and the height of Kony’s violence ended years ago, it is incredibly unclear WHO exactly this film is trying to motivate, or rather, who the average American college student should try to motivate once they watch this film. Surely not our government, as the United States has already launched several attempts on the life of Joseph Kony. In fact, just in October, President Obama sent a ton of Special Forces into Africa to eradicate the LRA.

It also couldn’t be the international community who we are supposed to inform about Mr. Kony’s actions. They have been on the case for years. The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Kony in 2005.

The thesis of the Kony 2012 campaign, which is that he is at large because people are just unaware that he is an asshole, would be funny if it were not so terribly sad. The fact that so many people believe something that is so patently and obviously false is astounding.

Of course, such shallow and misleading reporting should not surprise us coming from a group which Foreign Policy has said “manipulated facts for strategic purposes, exaggerating the scale of LRA abductions and murders and emphasizing the LRA’s use of innocent children as soldiers, and portraying Kony — a brutal man, to be sure — as uniquely awful, a Kurtz-like embodiment of evil”.

More than likely, this is about fame and money for those involved. A quick trip to the Kony 2012 video reveals that the top two ways to help are to “Donate to Invisible Children” and to “Purchase KONY 2012 products”. Of course. No discussion of how to become better informed. No links which can provide us with background information on the conflict. The only ways to help listed are 2 ways to donate money and the option to sign a pledge promising to share the video with more people (who could then potentially donate money).

Jason Russell, the narrator of film and a co-founder of the Invisible Children project provides us with a different explanation for the campaign towards the end of the film, stating

“In order for Kony to be arrested this year, the Ugandan military has to find him. In order to find him, they need the technology and training to track him in the vast jungle. That’s where the American advisors come in. But in order for the American advisors to be there, the American government has to deploy them. They’ve done that, but if the government doesn’t believe the people care about Kony, the mission will be cancelled.”

Really? That’s interesting, because despite having followed the mission since Policy on Point first covered it last October, I have not been able to find a single instance of the Obama Administration threatening to end it for any reason at all. One would think that if the threat of withdrawing forces is so imminent that it demands a wide-ranging marketing campaign that will no doubt  generate millions in donations someone besides the narrator of the film would have heard about it.

Joseph Kony (Far Left) With An United Nations Official

Finally, there is the clear racial element at play in the depictions used in the film. The main character of the film is Gavin, a white, American child (who is the son of the producer), which seems odd given that this is supposed to be a film about an African war criminal and his victims. The film uses constant allusions to the idea that such brutality could never happen in the West, further entrenching the idea of Africa as the dark continent in contrast to America as a safe, enlightened and noble society. What this obscures, of course, are the ways in which Western colonialism created the conditions that led to the formation of the LRA to begin with.

Great Britain colonized Uganda in the 19th century and chose to develop southern Uganda at the expense of the northern part of the country. The people of Northern Uganda, known as the Acholi, were treated terribly by the British and uneven systems of development created a deeply rooted economic divide and resentment that persisted into the 20th century. A Northern Ugandan resistance movement known as the Holy Spirit Movement led an insurrection against the government of Uganda in the 1980′s and an offshoot of this movement came to be known as the LRA.

The narrative of the conflict the film gives is narrow, one-dimensional, and far too simplistic to capture the complexities of what has happened and is continuing to happen in Central Africa. (This is a habitual shortsightedness on the part of the filmmakers, who have previously homogenized those who have been raped in the Congo as simply “The Raped”.) Kony 2012 portrays the issue as though it is a clear good v. evil struggle between the LRA and American/Ugandan freedom fighters. In fact, the narrative becomes so reductionist at one point that the producer directly asks his toddler aged son who “the bad guy” is in Uganda. After a few seconds, the producer confirms that indeed, Joseph Kony is “the bad guy”. In reality, of course, the demarcations of right and wrong are not so simple.

Much of the lines are blurred between good/evil in the region. Atrocities have been committed on both sides and much of the region has connections to either side of the conflict. One of the issues that makes it so hard to prosecute wrong-doing is that there are laws in place within Uganda that still protect members of the LRA. There are paths to amnesty for those who were former LRA members and these laws still enjoy wide support because much of the country has family who are former LRA members.

Of course the film doesn’t go into any of this. The film just asserts blanketly that Kony “must be stopped” and shows several montages of carnage meant to provoke emotions in the viewer which will lead them to give money to the Invisible Children campaign. Between the representations of mutilated black bodies and the call to arms directed for the affluent west to stop the personification of evil in Joseph Kony, it is easy to become enraged and forget that the film gives no mechanism, very little history and almost no serious geopolitical analysis. The film finally ends showing a montage of U.S. celebrities who support their project: Rihanna, George Clooney, Oprah; suggesting that people print flyers and wear bracelets; and of course, asking for money.

The apathy of the West in the face of atrocity is repugnant but perhaps how easily the West is willing to buy into narratives about saving the developing world is equally so. There are ways you can become involved and raise awareness without donating to Invisible Children. Very little of the money they receive actually goes to helping those they claim to represent and there is a high chance it will be used to fund more orientalist propaganda to be consumed by those who feel that linking to a YouTube video equates to “doing your part” to challenge global violence.

 

To learn more about the game of oil politics surrounding Obama’s decision to deploy troops in October to eradicate the LRA, I highly suggest you read Mark Sheffield’s excellent piece HERE.

For other critical perspectives of the Kony 2012 video, I recommend reading Amber Ha’s letter to producer Jason Russell which can be found HERE and the piece written by Siena Anstis HERE.

A Clever Animal, Africa, Important Developments, Military, Politics, Terrorism & Security, Uncategorized

About the author

A Clever Animal is the pseudonym for a writer who lives in New York City and works in the financial securities industry. He holds degrees in economics and political theory.

12 Responses to “Invisible Pipers: How “Kony 2012” is Enchanting the West and Recolonizing Africa”

  1. Name says:

    I’m fairly certain Africa is in no way a part of the Orient and thus it’s incorrect to say that Invisible Children creates orientalist depictions of African nations. Not to say that your point was incorrect, because clearly the representations the films uses are steeped in eurocentric privilege, just that you choose the wrong “academic” terminology by which to decry it.

    • A Clever Animal says:

      Thank you for your comment. However, orientalism as an academic term is used to refer not only to Middle and East Asian countries but to North African countries as well. More broadly applied, the Orient is anything to the East of a relative point. In that sense, orientalism would describe the Western subject position (Western Europe and in the context of the article, especially the United States) towards African or Asian nations.

  2. Rachel says:

    Thanks for this. I would still like to become involved and donate money – which organizations would you suggest?

    • A Clever Animal says:

      Thank you Rachel. This is an important question. While they certainly are not all perfect, I believe that the big name charities are the best in terms of transparency and effectiveness.
      I would recommend UNICEF – http://www.supportunicef.org
      or Oxfam – http://www.oxfam.org/en/getinvolved

      Additionally, a personal favorite of mine is Kiva. The model of Kiva is interesting because you can see exactly who your money is going to and what they plan on doing with it. The idea is to donate small amounts of money to people in developing countries that have small businesses so that they can grow their businesses which helps them to become self sustaining and in turn helps their local economies. More information on the organization can be found at – http://www.kiva.org/

  3. Nathan Murthy says:

    This is the best analysis of the #KONY2012 campaign I’ve read thus far.

  4. Sidi says:

    Let me get this straight. You, the author of this article is basically advocating for the public to channel their funds/donations to more ‘worthy’ organizations;which is fine if that is your opinion.

    However, as an African I speak vehemently against articles such as this which make the public second guess the true motive and intention of genuine campaigns such as invisible children. I watched this movie my sophomore year of college when it first came out. It was a bunch of kids who just wanted to help,no political motive, no ulterior motives just a bunch of college kids who wanted to make a difference.I even slept outside to demonstrate my support towards the child soldiers in Uganda.

    What is frustrating, is that what was meant to be good,what was meant to make a positive change in children’s lives, has now been heavily politicized,shifting the focus from the suffering children to politics. Oh you should donate to this organization rather than that, oh this commentary is racist etc etc. who gives a flying bull what politics is behind this cause.If we can just STAND aside and say OK one more evil has been brought to light,we can then keep moving forward to help, not only Uganda, but Darfur,China,Cambodia,Liberia etc etc. if we can only set aside the politics of the matter,and work at what really matters,from the heart,then many of the world’s problems would be better dealt with.

    • A Clever Animal says:

      People “sleeping outside” and thinking that it somehow changes the material conditions of the people who are suffering around the world is exactly why the IC campaign is counter-productive. Simply raising awareness without direct action to better the world does nothing but make make people like Jason Russell famous and make people like you feel like they have done something productive when in fact, they have not.

      The way these issues are framed and represented do matter. If racist representations lull the population into thinking that the problems will be solved by purchasing a Kony 2012 “action pack” then that is counter-productive and not something that I believe people should fund. You and I agree that bringing issues to light matters, but I think it is also important that we recognize and understand the methods used to do this.

      Its great that you are African, but I don’t think that makes your strategy of sleeping outside one day any more effective. To read about interviews in which Ugandans criticize of the way they were treated by the IC crew and represented in the film, read the articles we link to towards the bottom.

  5. Zambra says:

    You said, ” Very little of the money they receive actually goes to helping those they claim to represent and there is a high chance it will be used to fund more orientalist propaganda to be consumed by those who feel that linking to a YouTube video equates to “doing your part” to challenge global violence.”
    If you had done your research thoroughly, you may have found this

    http://c2052482.r82.cf0.rackcdn.com/images/737/original/FY11-Audited%20Financial%20Statements.pdf?1320205055

    • A Clever Animal says:

      Thank you for your comment Zambra. If you had read the article thoroughly, perhaps you would have noticed that this is actually the very first link we included. It is located in one of the paragraphs discussing how poorly the Invisible Children campaign manages their money and how little they spend on direct action. Please pay more careful attention before commenting next time.

      “The Invisible Children franchise makes its finances public and despite it taking in almost 14 million in revenues last year, it spent only $2.8 million on direct services, i.e. services which directly aid those who you see in the videos they create. Despite this, they managed to spend over a million dollars just on travel expenses, which comes down to almost $3,000 per day, every day of the week, all year long.”

  6. Facebook links | Pearltrees says:

    [...] Turning our attention to their most recent publicity stunt, one which has untold numbers of kids on Facebook patting themselves on the back for posting a link in their status updates about it, the group at Invisible Children has released a video which attempts to raise awareness of Joseph Kony so that the world take notice and presumably do something about it. Ignoring for a moment that this film is about a decade late in its release and the height of Kony’s violence ended years ago, it is incredibly unclear WHO exactly this film is trying to motivate, or rather, who the average American college student should try to motivate once they watch this film. Invisible Pipers: How “Kony 2012” is Enchanting the West and Recolonizing Africa [...]

  7. Invisible Children Needs to Stop “Having Fun” and Start Growing Up | The Generation says:

    [...] the average American teenager to motivate? The U.S. government? No. According to a Policy on Point article, “The United States has already launched several attempts on the life of Joseph Kony. In fact, [...]

  8. An entry from my research diary. « "Media" is plural says:

    [...] 2012. I kept reading all of these really negative reviews about the video’s assumptions of orientalism and white man’s burden. However, I didn’t want to spend months of my time trying to [...]

Leave a Reply